Abstract
Background:
Lavender has been used for centuries, but its exposure has become part of the everyday life in our days. It is used in the alternative medicine, and as a flavouring component in soaps, cosmetics and in food products (chocolate, ice-cream, spices). The increasing number of exposures resulted the appearance of hypersensitivity- reactions.
Objectives:
A survey on the prevalence of lavender hypersensitivity was conducted by the Contact Dermatitis Work-Group of the Hungarian Dermatological Society in a multicentre, prospective study.
Patients and Methods:
1509 consecutivedermatological patients of 7 dermatological centres were involved in this study. Results were based on the analyses of age distribution and characteristic clinical signs of the patients, on symptoms-localization, and on relevance of positive skin lavender oil test results as well as other associated contact hypersensitivities.
Results:
We detected 8 patients with lavender hypersensitivity (0.53%). Typical localisations of skin symptoms were face, eyelids and hands. Associated hypersensitivity to fragrance and balsam components were not detected.
Conclusion:
The lavender hypersensitivity of our patients couldn’t be detected by fragrance screening allergens.The use of lavender oil in cosmetics and foods is very popular. The different types of contacts may result further increase of the sensitivity rate worldwide.
Author Contributions
Academic Editor: Wenbin Tan, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine
Checked for plagiarism: Yes
Review by: Single-blind
Copyright © 2015 Györgyi Pónyai, et al.
Competing interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Citation:
Introduction
There are numerous species of lavender, the most well-known one is Lavandula angustifolia (known also as Lavandula officinalis). The majority of species contain essential oils in 1-3%. The oil is a mixture of different ingredients, may contain linalool, linalyl-acetate, camphor, geraniol, cumarins and flavones. Patients with geraniol sensitivity show a weak or strong reactions to ylang ylang oil or to lavender oil, thus they usually contain geraniol in various proportions. Cross-reactions of lavender oil have also been reported with Balsam of Peru and wood tar, but in case of a common presence simultaneous sensitization may also occur 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Due to its therapeutic (relaxing, antidepressive, antimicrobial, antimycotic) effects, lavender oil has been used for centuries as an alternative drug for a long time. Its use in cosmetics and in foods is also very popular worldwide, Exposure can be airborne (aromatherapy, perfumes) by oral route (teas, honey, jam, sweets, spices) or direct skin and mucous membrane contact (soaps, body oils, creams and mouthwashes)1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
The increasing number of applications resulted hypersensitivity-reactions in various localisations. Lavender oil can provoke contact dermatitis and photoallergic reactions. The strong, concentration-dependent irritative effect of the constituents may also raise the development of hypersensitivity1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
The Contact Dermatitis Work-Group of the Hungarian Dermatological Society organised and conducted a multicentre survey to map the frequency of lavender hypersensitivity in Hungary.
Material and Methods
We performed the epicutaneous patch tests in our multicentre, prospective study between February 1st 2013 and February 1st 2014. Besides environmental routine test series we also used 2% lavender oil in pet. (All test material from AllergEAZEBrial). The occlusion time by testing was 48h, the allergens were applied on the back. We used Curatest(Lohmann & Rauscher) chambers. Evaluation of the test was performed at the 60th minute of the occlusion, then on D2, D3, D4 and D7. Reactions were taken as positive 1+ or more intense11.
Number of the consecutivetested patients was 1509, 350 men and 1159 women. The mean age was 46.7 years (range: 9-92 years).
The number of tested patients were: in Budapest 711 (Dept. of Dermatology, Venerology and Dermatooncology of Semmelweis University /605/ + Dermatological Outpatient Dept. of the Unified Szt. István- Szt. László Hospital /74/ + National Work Hygiene and Occupational Healthcare Institute /32/), in Szeged: 299 (Dept. of Dermatology and Allergology of the Szent-Györgyi Albert Clinical Centre), in Kaposvár: 209 (Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital Dpt. Dermatology) in Debrecen: 195 (Dpt. of Dermatology of the University of Debrecen, in Miskolc: 95 (Semmelweis Medical Centre of Miskolc, Centre of Dermatology).
The most frequent clinical diagnoses of the patients (done before the patch testing) were allergic contact dermatitis (n=469), irritative contact dermatitis (n=476), atopic dermatitis (n=108) and seborrhoeic dermatitis / rosacea (n=150) (Table 1.).
Table 1. Diagnostic distribution of the tested patients and positive reactions to lavender oilDiagnosis | n | Hypersensitive reaction to lavender oil D2 or late | IR |
Allergic contact dermatitis | 469 | 7 | 4 |
Irritative contact dermatitis | 476 | 3 | |
Atopic dermatitis | 108 | 1 | |
Dyshydrosis | 38 | ||
Seborrhoeic dermatitis / Rosacea | 150 | 1 | |
Microbial eczema | 84 | ||
Stasis dermatitis | 38 | ||
Psoriasis | 54 | ||
Others * | 92 | ||
Total | 1509 | 8 | 8 |
Results
We verified contact hypersensitivity to lavender oil in 8 patients (0.53%): we could not detect any immediate reaction, all the positivities were late-type reactions, most reactions were observed at or after D3 (Table 1, Table 2). In 7 cases the present relevant positivity was confirmed by a specific provoking factor, one patient could not identify actually the contact (patient 1.: unknown relevance). Clinical symptoms affected the face and the eyelids in 5 patients.
We found associated sensitization in four patients (formaldehyde, mercury chloride, nickel, propylene glycol, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole /MBT/, thiuram mix, mercury chloride - ammoniated). We did not find any Fragrance Mix, Fragrance mix II, Balsam Peru (Myroxylon pereirae), colophonium, wood tar mix, sesquiterpene lactone mix, or turpentine peroxides hypersensitivity among our patients with lavender oil sensitivity (Table 2.).
Table 2. Clinical symptoms of lavender hypersensitivity and the provoking contacts, associated contact sensitivitiesCase number | Age (year) | Gender | Diagnosis | Localisations of skin symptoms | Intensity of reaction | type of relevance | Associated sensitivities | |||||
D2 | D3 | D4 | D7 | skin contact | airborne contact | |||||||
1. | 55 | male | ACD | face, oral mucosa | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | ? | ? | unknown | - |
2. | 85 | female | ACD | face, eyelids | - | - | - | ++ | soap | air freshener | present | - |
3. | 32 | female | ACD | eyelids | - | - | ++ | ++ | soap | present | nickel, formaldehyde, mercury chloride - ammoniated | |
4. | 41 | male | rosacea | face | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | air freshener | present | propylene glycol | |
5. | 55 | female | ACD | hands, wrist | - | + | ++ | ++ | living plant | volatile oil | present | - |
6. | 70 | male | ACD | hands, forearms | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | living plant | present | MBT, thiuram mix, mercury chloride - ammoniated, mercury chloride | |
7. | 59 | female | ACD | feet, sole | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | living plant | present | - | |
8. | 61 | female | ACD | face, forehead | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | cosmetics, dried plant | present | formaldehyde |
The skin symptom-provoking contacts were cosmetics (soap, baths, shampoos, creams) air fresheners, volatile oil and the lavender plant itself. One of our patients, a 55 year old woman came to our clinic with hand dermatitis (after direct contact with lavender plant) (Figure 1.). Besides this results, we detected 8 irritiant reactions.
Figure 1.a-b Contact dermatitis on the hand provoked by nursing the lavender plant of a 55 year old female patient (patient no. 5).
Discussion
Exposure to lavender oil can induce contact dermatitis or photoallergic reactions. The strong concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect of its constituents may cause irritation and also enhance sensitisation. This may typically occur during application of different mixtures of volatile oils, tinctures, massage oils, perfumes and aromatherapy. Linalool and linalyl acetate are week sensitisers but in case of getting into contact with air, autooxidation leads to formation of oxidation products and thus they become strong allergens12, 13. Its photosensitizing reactions are thought to be associated with cytotoxicity and psoralen contamination of the essential oils2. In the course of distillation of lavender flower other allergenic components can also be identified: lavandulol, 1,8-cineol, lavandulyl acetate, camphor and geranium oil. Lavender oil is also often applied on the skin without dilution and it appears in the plasma due to the rapid absorption of its ingredients 3, 14, 15.
Lavender oil is usually patch tested at 2% in pet, but De Groot recommends different concentrations (1,2,5,8,10,16 % pet ) – for various species of the plant16, 17. Recent results of a French centre suggest to include lavender oil testing in the baseline series18.
Searching the frequency of contact sensitization to lavender, Calnan19 detected a prevalence of 0.52% in 1970. Rudzki proved lavender contact sensitization with 2% lavender oil in pet. in 2% of 200 patch tested patients20. Larsen et al verified a lavender sensitization rate of 2.8% by testing selected fragrance - sensitive patients16.
In a Japanese study conducted between 1990 and 1997, Sugiura et al found an increasing frequency (1.1% - 13.9%) of contact allegy to lavender oil tested at 20% pet, in a selected population of patients with cosmetic contact dermatitis, with lesions localized mainly to the face, eyelid and hands. Dermatitis was related to exposure to air fresheners, perfumes, aroma candles and the plant itself 21. In ours as in other studies, anatomical localisations of typical lavender contact allergy are hands, body, face2, 4, 8, 9, 15, 22, 23, but exposure to the allergen frequently remains hidden21.
Conclusions
According to the data of our multicentre study the prevalence of sensitization to lavender oil in Hungary is 0.53% at present (8/1509 patients). In the course of the tests we could not detect any immediate test-reaction, all the positivities were late-type test-reactions. In 7/8 cases the present relevant positivity was confirmed by a specific provoking factor, typical were cosmetics, air fresheners and the plant itself. According to our everyday practical experiences a lot of people use lavender oil in cosmetics, in foods or as natural drug in our country. The contacts become more and more frequently, so further increase of the sensitivity rate may be expected.
Ethics
The work has been approved by the ethical committees and all the subjects gave informed consent to the work.
References
- 1.Gangemi S, P L Minciullo, Miroddi M. (2015) Contact dermatitis as an adverse reaction to some topically used European herbal medicinal products – Part 2: Echinacea purpurea – Lavandula angustifolia. , Contact Dermatitis 72, 193-205.
- 3.Prashar A, I C Locke, C S Evans. (2004) Cytotoxicity of lavender oil and its major components to human skin cells. , Cell Prolif 37, 221-229.
- 4.A R Jack, P L Norris, F J Storrs. (2013) Allergic contact dermatitis to plant extracts in cosmetics. , Semin Cutan Med Surg 32, 140-146.
- 5.Benezra C, Ducombs G, Sell Y, Foussereau. Plant Contact Dermatitis BC Decker INC Toronto, Philadelphia,CV Mosby Company Saint Louis,Toronto,London178 (1985) .
- 6.Sienkiewicz M, Łysakowska M, Ciećwierz J, Denys P, Kowalczyk E. (2011) Antibacterial activity of thyme and lavender essential oils. , Med Chem 7, 674-689.
- 7.Roller S, Ernest N, Buckle J. (2009) The antimicrobal activity of high-necrodane and other lavender oils on methicillin–sensitive and – resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA). , J Altern Complement Med 15, 275-279.
- 8.Varma S, Blackford S, B N Statham, Blackwell A. (2000) Combined contact allergy to tea tree oil and lavander oil complicating chronic vulvovaginitis. , Contact Dermatitis 42, 309-310.
- 9.I H Coulson, A S Khan. (1999) Facial’pillow’ dermatitis due to levander oil allergy. , Contact Dermatitis 41, 111.
- 10.Goiriz R, Delgado-Jiménez Y, Sánchez-Pérez J, García-Diez A. (2007) Photoallergic contact dermatitis from lavender oil in topical ketoprofen. , Contact Dermatitis 57, 381-382.
- 11.Wahlberg J E. (1995) Patch test gudelines. In: Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edition. Rycroft RJG, Menné, T., Frosch, P. (eds.) , Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 241-268.
- 12.Sköld M, Hagvall L, A T Karlberg. (2008) Autooxidation of linalylacetate, the main component of lavender oil, creates potent contact allergens. , Contact Dermatitis 58, 9-14.
- 13.Hagvall L, Sköld M, Brared-Christensson J, Börje A, A T Karlberg. (2008) Lavender oil lacks natural protection against autoxidation, forming strong contact allergens on air exposure. , Contact Dermatitis 59, 143-150.
- 14.Jäger W, Buchbauer G, Jirovetz L, Fritzer M. (1992) Percutaneous absoption of lavender oil from a massage oil. , J Soc Cosmet Chem 43-49.
- 15.D A Kiken, D E Cohen. (2002) Contact Dermatitis to botanical extracts. , Am J Contact Dermat 13, 148-152.
- 16.Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, Elsner P, Frosch P. (2002) Fragrance contact dermatitis - a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part III). , Contact Dermatitis 46, 141-144.
- 18.Schoeffler A, Waton J, Latarche C, Poreaux C, J F Cuny. (2013) Changes in the European baseline series from 1981 to 2011 in a French dermatology-allergology centre. , Ann Dermatol Verereol 140, 499-509.
- 19.Calnan C D. (1970) Oil of cloves, laurel, lavender, peppermint. , Contact Dermatitis Newsletter 7, 148.
- 20.Rudzki E, Kielak D. (1972) Sensitivity to some compounds related to Balsam of Peru. , Contact Dermatitis Newsl 12, 335-336.
- 21.Sugiura M, Hayakawa R, Kato Y, Sugiura K, Hashimoto R. (2000) Results of patch testing with lavender oil in Japan. , Contact Dermatitis 43, 157-160.
Cited by (1)
- 1.Horváth Hanga Réka, Szilágyi Dávid, Andrási Noémi, Balla Zsuzsanna, Visy Beáta, et al, 2023, Hypersensitivity reactions amongst Hungarian Patients with Hereditary Angioedema due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency, World Allergy Organization Journal, 16(11), 100833, 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100833