Journal of Neurological Research And Therapy

Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy

Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy

Current Issue Volume No: 4 Issue No: 1

Short Communication Open Access Available online freely Peer Reviewed Citation Provisional

Dynamic Network Analysis of Functional Connectivity in Dementia: Unraveling Temporal Patterns and Therapeutic Implications

1School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41566, South Korea

2Department of Mathematics, University of Ilorin, PMB 1515, Ilorin 240103, Nigeria


Exploring the dynamic dimension of functional connectivity in dementia, this article departs from traditional static studies to capture the ever-changing brain networks. Investigating temporal connectivity patterns yields valuable insights into disease progression, individualized treatment, and early intervention. Additionally, the concept of cognitive reserve, therapeutic interventions, and machine learning integration are pivotal in revolutionizing dementia research and care.

Author Contributions
Received 2 May 2024; Accepted 11 May 2024; Published 22 May 2024;

Academic Editor: Sasho Stoleski, Institute of Occupational Health of R. Macedonia, WHO CC and Ga2len CC.

Checked for plagiarism: Yes

Review by: Single-blind

Copyright ©  2024 Abdulyekeen T. Adebisi,

Creative Commons License     This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


Abdulyekeen T. Adebisi, Al-Musibahu AbdulRahim (2024) Dynamic Network Analysis of Functional Connectivity in Dementia: Unraveling Temporal Patterns and Therapeutic Implications. Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy - 4(1):41-45.

Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )

DOI 10.14302/issn.2470-5020.jnrt-24-5100


The escalating prevalence of dementia disorders presents an increasingly formidable challenge in modern healthcare, with a profound impact on individuals and society at large. Traditional research in this field has predominantly focused on static functional connectivity studies, which have undeniably provided valuable insights into the altered brain networks associated with dementia 1. However, the limitations of this static perspective are becoming increasingly apparent. Dementia is not a static condition, and to comprehend its complexities fully, it is imperative to delve into the temporal dynamics of these networks 11, 12.

The significance of investigating temporal functional connectivity in dementia becomes evident when we consider the dynamic nature of the brain. In contrast to the static snapshot offered by traditional methods, the brain’s connectivity is inherently variable and ever- changing 2. Recent advances in neuroimaging techniques, such as resting- state fMRI and EEG, combined with the development of sophisticated data analysis tools, now empower researchers to capture the temporal dynamics of functional connectivity. By adopting this dynamic perspective, we open new horizons for exploring the subtle, time- dependent changes in brain networks associated with dementia, moving beyond a one-size- fits-all approach to one that is more personalized and subtle.

The shift towards understanding temporal patterns in functional connectivity holds great promise for dementia research and clinical practice. It not only promises a more comprehensive comprehension of the underlying neurobiology of these disorders but also has the potential to revolutionize therapeutic strategies. Tailoring treatments to the individual needs of patients and tracking their progress over time could provide new hope for those affected by dementia. In this evolving landscape, the study of dynamic network analysis of functional connectivity in dementia research stands as a beacon, guiding us towards a future with more precise and effective approaches to care and intervention for these challenging conditions.

Temporal Connectivity Patterns

Temporal connectivity patterns in dementia disorders play a crucial role in understanding the progression and impact of these conditions on the brain 5. Dementia encompasses a range of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and frontotemporal dementia, all of which exhibit distinctive temporal connectivity alterations 4. One of the major key aspects of temporal connectivity in dementia is the disruption of functional networks over time 7. Studies have revealed that as these disorders advance, patients often experience a decline in network efficiency, leading to cognitive impairment 3. Temporal connectivity patterns help identify when and how these alterations occur, aiding in the early detection and monitoring of disease progression.

Moreover, these patterns provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms underlying dementia. Abnormal temporal connectivity is associated with the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates, inflammation, and neuronal loss 15, 10. Understanding these temporal dynamics can guide the development of targeted interventions and therapies. Analyzing temporal connectivity patterns also facilitates the differentiation of dementia sub-types. Each disorder exhibits distinct connectivity alterations in specific brain regions and networks. Recognizing these differences is essential for accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment approaches.

Temporal functional connectivity as a predictive biomarker

Temporal functional connectivity unveils an exciting perspective in the realm of dementia research and clinical practice. It emerges as a beacon of hope for predicting the progression of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and frontotemporal dementia. The gradual cognitive decline characteristic of dementia necessitates a means to anticipate and monitor this journey. Temporal functional connectivity, exploring the intricate interactions between brain regions over time, offers a profound glimpse into the dynamic landscape of dementia. Intriguingly, research reveals that disruptions in temporal connectivity can manifest long before visible symptoms, serving as a potential harbinger of cognitive deterioration.

What sets temporal functional connectivity apart is its power to personalize dementia care. By pinpointing specific connectivity deviations associated with distinct sub-types of dementia, such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s, healthcare providers gain the ability to tailor treatment regimens to the individualized needs of each patient. Moreover, the longitudinal assessment of temporal connectivity becomes a dependable compass for gauging the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, enabling timely adjustments when required. This predictive biomarker is not merely a tool for early diagnosis but a pathway to crafting precise and proactive strategies for dementia management. It ignites a ray of optimism for patients and their families, providing new prospects in the battle against these formidable disorders.

Network Resilience and Cognitive Reserve

Cognitive reserve, a concept that has gained significant traction in the context of neurodegenerative disorders like dementia 9, offers a profound lens through which we can fathom the intricacies of dynamic functional connectivity in the brain. This concept represents the brain’s remarkable ability to adapt, reorganize, and even compensate for damage or pathology, enabling individuals to preserve cognitive function amidst the challenges of neural degeneration. Dynamic functional connectivity, a method that scrutinizes the ever-evolving neural connections within the brain over time, has emerged as a pivotal instrument in deciphering the mechanisms that underlie cognitive reserve.

Within individuals boasting a high degree of cognitive reserve, dynamic functional connectivity studies have unveiled astonishing adaptability in the face of dementia-related transformations 14, 13. These individuals exhibit resilient and malleable brain network reconfigurations, endowing them with the capacity to sustain cognitive performance even in the presence of structural brain damage. For instance, in the realm of Alzheimer’s disease, a surplus of cognitive reserve might empower an individual to better manage the functional disintegration of vital brain regions responsible for memory and reasoning. Consequently, notwithstanding comparable levels of neuropathology, those with more substantial cognitive reserve may experience dementia-related symptoms much later in life or in a milder form compared to their counterparts with lower cognitive reserve.

The symbiotic relationship between cognitive reserve and dynamic functional connectivity holds profound implications for both dementia research and clinical practice. It accentuates the potential for interventions that can augment cognitive reserve, such as cognitive training, physical exercise, and social engagement, offering the promise of delaying the onset or decelerating the progression of dementia. Furthermore, it emphasizes the imperative for personalized approaches to dementia care that take into account an individual’s cognitive reserve capacity, with the aim of optimizing their brain’s dynamic functional connectivity. In essence, as we delve deeper into the dynamic interplay between cognitive reserve and the adaptability of neural networks, we unlock new avenues for early intervention and personalized treatment strategies in our ongoing battle against dementia.

Interventional Approaches

In the realm of neuroscience and mental health, dynamic functional connectivity is emerging as a transformative concept with vast therapeutic potential 14. This dynamic connectivity approach allows us to delve deep into the ever-changing patterns of neural communication, offering a fresh perspective on neurological and psychiatric disorders. As we journey through this uncharted territory, we uncover exciting possibilities for therapeutic interventions that have the power to reshape the landscape of mental health care.

One intriguing avenue is the realm of neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). By targeting specific brain regions and their connectivity, we can potentially alleviate the burdens of conditions like depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. These interventions offer newfound hope by influencing the very pathways that underlie cognitive control, emotional regulation, and memory consolidation.

Another remarkable frontier is real-time neurofeedback, where individuals gain insight into their own brain activity. Armed with this knowledge, they can actively modulate connectivity patterns, potentially improving disorders like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or aiding in the rehabilitation journey after stroke or traumatic brain injury. This empowerment to steer our own neural networks presents a future where individuals are not just passive recipients of care but active participants in their mental well-being.

In this perspective, we stand at the threshold of a new era in mental health treatment. The dynamic functional connectivity paradigm, with its therapeutic interventions, invites us to rethink how we understand and manage neurological and psychiatric conditions. As we traverse this transformative landscape, we anticipate a future where individuals hold the reins to their cognitive health, offering a brighter, more personalized outlook for mental well-being.

Machine Learning Applications

The synergy between machine learning and the intricate domain of neuroscience has unveiled a promising perspective on temporal functional connectivity analysis and prediction. Temporal functional connectivity, a dynamic portrayal of brain regions’ interactions over time, represents a unique facet of brain activity. Machine learning algorithms, with their data- crunching prowess, have embarked on a remarkable journey to decode the intricate temporal dynamics of the brain.

Machine learning models dive into the vast pool of data generated by advanced neuroimaging techniques like fMRI and EEG. Their ability to unearth subtle, time-dependent connectivity patterns empowers them to distinguish the normal from the anomalous, thus offering valuable insights into conditions such as dementia, where temporal connectivity disruptions loom large.

Beyond pattern recognition, these algorithms provide an exciting vantage point. They can foresee how temporal functional connectivity patterns may evolve, holding great potential for early diagnosis and intervention in neurodegenerative disorders 8. This marriage of machine learning and temporal functional connectivity analysis promises to revolutionize our comprehension of the brain’s intricate choreography of connectivity

over time. It illuminates not only healthy neural function but also the underpinnings of neurological diseases, presenting a transformative perspective in the quest for effective treatments and a deeper understanding of the human brain’s intricacies.


  1. 1.A T, K C Veluvolu. (2023) Brain network analysis for the discrimination of dementia disorders using electrophysiology signals: A systematic review. , Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 15, 1039496.
  1. 2.E A Allen, Damaraju E, S M Plis, E B, Eichele T et al. (2014) Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral cortex 24. 663-676.
  1. 3.E M Boot, Leijsen E M van, M I Bergkamp, R P Kessels, D G Norris et al. (2020) Structural network efficiency predicts cognitive decline in cerebral small vessel disease. , NeuroImage: Clinical 27, 102325.
  1. 4.Bracca V, Cantoni V, Gadola Y, Rivolta J, Cosseddu M et al. (2023) Neurophysiological correlates of altered time awareness in alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. , Neurological Sciences 1.
  1. 5.Courtney S, Hinault T. (2021) When the time is right: Temporal dynamics of brain activity in healthy aging and dementia. Progress in neurobiology 203 102076.
  1. 6.Dautricourt S, Gonneaud J, Landeau B, V D Calhoun, R de Flores et al. (2022) Dynamic functional connectivity patterns associated with dementia risk. , Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy 14, 72.
  1. 7.Filippi M, E G Spinelli, Cividini C, Agosta F. (2019) Resting state dynamic functional connectivity in neurodegenerative conditions: a review of magnetic resonance imaging findings. Frontiers in neuroscience 13. 657.
  1. 8.Gao Z, Feng Y, Ma C, Ma K, Cai Q et al. (2020) Disrupted time- dependent and functional connectivity brain network in alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state fmri study based on visibility graph. , Current Alzheimer Research 17, 69-79.
  1. 9.Gelonch O, Cano N, Vancells M, Bolaños M, Farràs-Permanyer L et al. (2020) The effects of exposure to recent autobiographical events on declarative memory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary pilot study. , Current Alzheimer Research 17, 158-167.
  1. 10.Guzman-Martinez L, R B Maccioni, G A Farías, Fuentes P, L P Navarrete. (2019) Biomarkers for alzheimer’s disease. , Current Alzheimer Research 16, 518-528.
  1. 11.R M Hutchison, Womelsdorf T, E A Allen, P A Bandettini, V D Calhoun et al. (2013) Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. , Neuroimage 80, 360-378.
  1. 12.Nobukawa S, Kikuchi M, Takahashi T. (2019) Changes in functional connectivity dynamics with aging: a dynamical phase synchronization approach. , Neuroimage 188, 357-368.
  1. 13.Pinto C, K Y Tandel. (2016) Cognitive reserve: Concept, determinants, and promotion. , Journal of geriatric mental health 3, 44-51.
  1. 14.S D Pizzi, Granzotto A, Bomba M, Frazzini V, Onofrj M et al. (2020) Acting before; a combined strategy to counteract the onset and progression of dementia. , Current Alzheimer Research 17, 790-804.
  1. 15.Tzioras M, R I McGeachan, C S Durrant, T L Spires-Jones. (2023) Synaptic degeneration in alzheimer disease. , Nature Reviews Neurology 19.