Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- ISSN
- 2643-6655
- Access
- Open access
- License
- CC BY 4.0, authors retain copyright
- Publisher
- Open Access Pub
What the journal sets out to do
The journal exists so that work on the mental health of children and adolescents can be read together rather than in separate literatures. A mechanism, a measure, a treatment and a service question are usually the same problem approached from different positions, and the evidence for each is stronger when the others are visible.
Submissions are read against development. The age at which an observation was made, the stage the participants had reached, and the instruments used to reach them are part of what the finding means, and the journal expects them to be reported as such.
The journal publishes work that is answerable on its own terms. A theoretical paper is assessed as theory, a measurement study as measurement, and a trial as a trial; none is asked to meet the standard of evidence belonging to another kind of work.
The research the journal considers
The formats the journal considers
- Research Article
Empirical studies presenting novel findings. - Review Article
A scholarly review of a topic, setting out what is established and where the open questions lie. - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Evidence synthesis conducted to a pre-specified protocol. - Methods Article
A study design, measure, instrument or analytical approach presented so that others can apply it. - Data/Resource Article
A dataset, cohort or research resource described so that others can use it. - Short Communication
Preliminary findings or focused studies. - Case Report
Instructive clinical case presentations.
Editorial and Perspective/Commentary are published by invitation from the editors.
Word limits and preparation requirements for each format are set out on the Instructions for Author page.
How fit is judged
A manuscript fits when its question bears on the mental health, development or care of children or adolescents. Research on 18- and 19-year-olds and transition to adult care is included when the adolescent or developmental question remains central. The work must be reported fully enough for a reader in a neighboring discipline to judge it.
Work without a child-, adolescent-, or transition-related mental-health question — adult samples with no developmental question, or general methodology with no bearing on young people — is better served by another journal, and the editors will say so early.
Scope and evidence are judged separately. Eligibility follows the subject; the strength of a causal, predictive or clinical claim is assessed against the design that supports it.
All submissions undergo initial editorial screening. Manuscripts that meet the journal’s scope and minimum requirements proceed to independent peer review.
Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request.
Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts.
Editorial decisions are based on scope, scientific quality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, reporting quality, and relevance to the journal.
Editorial decisions are independent of fees, services, membership, and editorial or reviewer roles.
Read further
- About the JournalWhy the journal exists and who its readers are.
- Instructions for AuthorsArticle types, limits and preparation requirements.
- Editorial PoliciesEthics, authorship, peer review and corrections.
- Submit PaperThe approved routes for sending a manuscript.